Debunking 9/11 myths : why conspiracy theories can't stand up to the facts
(Book)
Contributors
Status
Adult Non-Fiction - Non-Fiction Sect.
973.9 Debunking
1 available
973.9 Debunking
1 available
Description
Loading Description...
Also in this Series
Checking series information...
Copies
| Location | Call Number | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Adult Non-Fiction - Non-Fiction Sect. | 973.9 Debunking | On Shelf |
More Details
Format
Book
Physical Desc
xxiii, 216 pages : col. ill. ; 21 cm.
Language
English
Notes
General Note
Reprint. Originally published: c2006.
General Note
"Includes new findings on World Trade Center Building 7."
General Note
"An in-depth investigation by Popular Mechanics."
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (p. 154-164) and index.
Description
Analyzes and refutes twenty of the most predominant theories involving the United States government's role in perpetrating the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
Reviews from GoodReads
Loading GoodReads Reviews.
Citations
APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)
Dunbar, D., & Reagan, B. (2011). Debunking 9/11 myths: why conspiracy theories can't stand up to the facts . Hearst Books.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Dunbar, David, 1953- and Brad. Reagan. 2011. Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts. Hearst Books.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Dunbar, David, 1953- and Brad. Reagan. Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts Hearst Books, 2011.
MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)Dunbar, David, and Brad Reagan. Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts Hearst Books, 2011.
Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.
MARC Record
Loading Staff View.
